User Tools

Site Tools


frameless_neuronavigation_system

Frameless neuronavigation system

The use of surgical neuronavigation systems is becoming an increasingly important part of planning and performing intracranial surgery 1) 2) 3).

However, there is an overvaluation of using these methods since in most cases they are only used for the craniotomy positioning 4) 5).

Indications

Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy.

Allows more flexibility during microsurgical procedures. Introduced into neurosurgical routine in the late 1980s and early 1990s, several advantages of this technology have been pointed out 6) 7).

Placement of the Ommaya reservoir

Slit-like ventricles

Types

Stealthstation

BrainLab VectorVision

Excelim-04 Image-guide System, Fudan Digital Medical Company, Shanghai, China.

Limitations

Being based on preoperative acquired images it does not take into account intraoperative changes due to tumor resection, brain shift and brain deformation 8) 9) 10) 11).

Besides the benefits of neuronavigation in tumor localization, tumor resection control, skull base surgery, or in procedures close to functional important structures, several publications pointed out that one of the most valuable applications of frameless neuronavigation was the localization of the craniotomy.

To overcome the limitations of NN based on preoperative imaging, recently it has been proposed to use intraoperative imaging for meningioma surgery: MRI (iMRI), CT (iCT), intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) and also fluorescent imaging (5-ALA) 12) 13) 14)

Wagner and coworkers 15) showed that in 40% of the cases that had been operated on using intraoperative neuronavigation, the system was only needed to correctly define size and position of the craniotomy. This observation was confirmed in a study of Spivak and colleagues 16).

Integration of metabolism images into multimodal neuronavigation provide not only anatomical, but also metabolic and functional information for frameless stereotaxy, increasing diagnostic yield and avoiding postoperative neurologic deficits 17).

Medtronic

Surgical navigation systems from Medtronic:

StealthStation S7 Surgical Navigation System

StealthStation i7™ – This versatile, integrated surgical navigation system incorporates all the latest navigation technologies into a ceiling mounted boom system to free up space in your OR. Featuring versatile equipment and intra-operative imaging interfaces to optimize your surgical experience.

StealthStation iNav® – This fee-per-use, portable system was designed so every hospital can offer the benefits of surgical navigation technology.

AxiEM Electromagnetic Navigation System – This unique, electromagnetic (EM) tracking technology provides tip-tracking of flexible surgical instruments.

Fusion™ ENT – This innovative EM surgical navigation system is accurate, easy to use, and expandable as needed.

StealthViz™ Planning Station – A powerful 2D/3D surgical planning application that simplifies advanced image viewing, processing, and morphing for navigation.

Frameless neuronavigation based on 3D CTA (3D catheter angiography) registered by only the surface anatomy data contained within the 3D DSA image set. This is an easily applied technique that is beneficial for accurately locating vascular pathological entities and reducing the dissection burden of vascular lesions 18).

While frameless stereotaxis can be used for shunt ventricular catheter placement in patients with smaller ventricles, the ventricular catheter is still commonly placed based on the surface anatomy of the head for patients with larger ventricles. Thus, surgical techniques and guides facilitating accurate and reliable freehand placement of the ventricular catheter still need to be devised.

1)
Ganslandt O., Behari S., Gralla J., Fahlbusch R., Nimsky C. Neuronavigation: Concept, techniques and applications. Neurol. India. 2002;50:244–255.
2) , 4)
Enchev Y.P., Popov R.V., Romansky K.V., Marinov M.B., Bussarsky V.A. Cranial neuronavigation-a step forward or a step aside in modern neurosurgery. Folia Med. 2008;50:5–10.
3)
Schroeder H.W., Wagner W., Tschiltschke W., Gaab M.R. Frameless neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. J. Neurosurg. 2001;94:72–79.
5) , 15)
Wagner W., Gaab M.R., Schroeder H.W., Tschiltschke W. Cranial neuronavigation in neurosurgery: Assessment of usefulness in relation to type and site of pathology in 284 patients. Minim. Inv. Neurosurg. 2000;43:124–131.
6)
Schroeder H.W., Wagner W., Tschiltschke W., Gaab M.R. Frameless neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. J. Neurosurg. 2001;94:72–79
7)
Woerdeman P.A., Willems P.W., Noordmans H.J., Tulleken C.A., van der Sprenkel J.W. Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: A comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. J. Neurosurg. 2007;106:1012–1016.
8)
Dorward, N.L., et al., Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg, 1998. 88(4): p. 656-62.
9)
Nimsky, C., et al., Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery, 2000. 47(5): p. 1070-9; discussion 1079-80.
10)
Orringer, D.A., A. Golby, and F. Jolesz, Neuronavigation in the surgical management of brain tumors: current and future trends. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2012. 9(5): p. 491-500.
11)
Stieglitz, L.H., et al., The silent loss of neuronavigation accuracy: a systematic retrospective analysis of factors influencing the mismatch of frameless stereotactic systems in cranial neurosurgery. Neurosurgery, 2013. 72(5): p. 796-807.
12)
Cornelius, J.F., et al., Impact of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence-guided Surgery on the Extent of Resection of Meningiomas-with Special Regard to High-grade Tumors. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2014.
13)
Soleman, J., et al., The role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in complex meningioma surgery. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013. 31(6): p. 923-9.
14)
Uhl, E., et al., Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in a multidisciplinary operating suite. Neurosurgery, 2009. 64(5 Suppl 2): p. 231-9; discussion 239-40.
16)
Spivak C.J., Pirouzmand F. Comparison of the reliability of brain lesion localization when using traditional and stereotactic image-guided techniques: A prospective study. J. Neurosurg. 2005;103:424–427.
17)
Li FY, Chen XL, He TT, Zhang JS, Song ZJ, Li JJ, Zheng G, Hu S, Zhang T, Xu BN. [Integration of metabolism images into multimodal neuronavigation for frameless stereotaxy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;51(4):358-61. Chinese. PubMed PMID: 23895760.
18)
Stidd DA, Wewel J, Ghods AJ, Munich S, Serici A, Keigher KM, Theessen H, Moftakhar R, Lopes DK. Frameless neuronavigation based only on 3D digital subtraction angiography using surface-based facial registration. J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):745-50. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS132386. Epub 2014 Jul 18. PubMed PMID: 25036204.
frameless_neuronavigation_system.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/27 12:13 by administrador