User Tools

Site Tools


machine_learning

Machine learning

Lazaridis et al., and others, have developed predictive models based on machine learning from continuous time series of intracranial pressure and partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen. These models provide accurate predictions of physiologic crises events in a timely fashion, offering the opportunity for an earlier application of targeted interventions.They review the rationale for prediction, discuss available predictive models with examples, and offer suggestions for their future prospective testing in conjunction with preventive clinical algorithms 1).


Machine learning (ML) is a domain of artificial intelligence that allows computer algorithms to learn from experience without being explicitly programmed.

To summarize neurosurgical applications of ML where it has been compared to clinical expertise, here referred to as “natural intelligence.”

Two important and rapidly developing scientific movements—data reproducibility and machine learning—are central to a recent Neuron paper by Chung et al 2)


A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases as of August 2016 to review all studies comparing the performance of various ML approaches with that of clinical experts in neurosurgical literature.

Twenty-three studies were identified that used ML algorithms for diagnosis, presurgical planning, or outcome prediction in neurosurgical patients. Compared to clinical experts, ML models demonstrated a median absolute improvement in accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve of 13% (interquartile range 4-21%) and 0.14 (interquartile range 0.07-0.21), respectively. In 29 (58%) of the 50 outcome measures for which a P -value was provided or calculated, ML models outperformed clinical experts ( P < .05). In 18 of 50 (36%), no difference was seen between ML and expert performance ( P > .05), while in 3 of 50 (6%) clinical experts outperformed ML models ( P < .05). All 4 studies that compared clinicians assisted by ML models vs clinicians alone demonstrated a better performance in the first group.

We conclude that ML models have the potential to augment the decision-making capacity of clinicians in neurosurgical applications; however, significant hurdles remain associated with creating, validating, and deploying ML models in the clinical setting. Shifting from the preconceptions of a human-vs-machine to a human-and-machine paradigm could be essential to overcome these hurdles 3).


Yepes-Calderon et al. presented a segmentation strategy based on an algorithm that uses four features extracted from the medical images to create a statistical estimator capable of determining ventricular volume. When compared with manual segmentations, the correlation was 94% and holds promise for even better accuracy by incorporating the unlimited data available. The volume of any segmentable structure can be accurately determined utilizing the machine learning strategy presented and runs fully automatically within the PACS 4).

1)
Lazaridis C, Rusin CG, Robertson CS. Secondary Brain Injury: Predicting and Preventing Insults. Neuropharmacology. 2018 Jun 6. pii: S0028-3908(18)30279-X. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.005. [Epub ahead of print] Review. PubMed PMID: 29885419.
2)
Chung JE, Magland JF, Barnett AH, Tolosa VM, Tooker AC, Lee KY, Shah KG, Felix SH, Frank LM, Greengard LF. A Fully Automated Approach to Spike Sorting. Neuron. 2017 Sep 13;95(6):1381-1394.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.030. PubMed PMID: 28910621; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5743236.
3)
Senders JT, Arnaout O, Karhade AV, Dasenbrock HH, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, Smith TR. Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review. Neurosurgery. 2017 Sep 7. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx384. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28945910.
4)
Yepes-Calderon F, Nelson MD, McComb JG. Automatically measuring brain ventricular volume within PACS using artificial intelligence. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193152. eCollection 2018. PubMed PMID: 29543817.
machine_learning.txt · Last modified: 2018/06/11 11:51 by administrador