Tethered spinal cords are a group of complicated developmental malformations of the spinal cord.
There is some overlapping of the naming of these conditions and some of them are cases of closed spina bifida. The various forms include such conditions as: tight filum terminale, lipomeningomyelocele, split cord malformations, dermal sinus tracts , dermoids, and cystoceles.
In general, what all of these conditions have in common is a pulling on the spinal cord at the base of the spinal canal. As children grow, their spinal cords do not grow as quickly as there spinal columns so relatively the spinal cord must be able to freely ascend on the inside of the spinal column during growth. If various abnormal structures are holding onto the spinal cord from below it stretches the spinal cord and this can lead to progressive loss of function.
In general, most pediatric neurosurgeons recommend these conditions be operated on to pr otect the growing spinal cord. For the child that has reached adult height with minimal if any symptoms, some neurosurgeons would advocate careful observation only. The operation is tailored to the cause of the tethering. In general the spinal column is o pened from behind to expose the extent of the sites of tethering of the spinal cord. Often neurosurgeons will have neurophysiologists monitor spinal cord and nerve function during the delicate operation to minimize risk to these structures.
The great majority of children tolerate the surgery well and most improve or at least stabilize with regards to their level of function. There is a potential for the spinal cord to retether as the child gets older and for this reason it is im portant that they be carefully monitored.
The association of urinary, cutaneous, and skeletal abnormalities with spinal dysraphism was recognized in the 20th century. Early in the 20th century, some physicians began to suspect that traction on the conus medullaris caused myelodysplasia-related symptoms and that prophylactic surgical management could prevent the occurrence of clinical manifestations. It was not, however, until later in the 20th century that the term “tethered spinal cord” and the modern management of TCS were introduced. This gradual advancement in understanding at a time before the development of modern imaging modalities illustrates how, over the centuries, anatomists, pathologists, neurologists, and surgeons used clinical examination, a high level of suspicion, and interest in the subtle and overt clinical appearances of spinal dysraphism and TCS to advance understanding of pathophysiology, clinical appearance, and treatment of this entity. With the availability of modern imaging, spinal dysraphism can now be diagnosed and treated as early as the intrauterine stage.
The first category includes lumbosacral cord anchored by an inelastic filum.
The second category includes caudal myelomeningoceles and many sacral myelomeningoceles.
The third category is divided into 2 groups.
The first group includes patients with paraplegia and lipomyelomeningocele and myelomeningocele who apparently have no functional lumbosacral neurons. No neurologic benefit is expected from surgery in this group.
The second group includes asymptomatic patients with an elongated cord and a thick filum. They need close observation for onset of subtle symptoms, particularly incontinence, which if untreated becomes quickly irreversible 1).
see also Tethered Cord Syndrome in Adulthood.
The cause of a tethered cord is not always known.
It is sometimes found with spina bifida.
Tethered cord happens when something catches hold of the spinal cord and does not let it move freely. Usually, one of these things catches the cord:
A tight filum terminale. Normally it is stretchy, but sometimes it is tight and tethers the cord.
A piece of bone can catch a part of the spinal cord.
Fat: Sometimes, fat grows in and around the spinal cord and catches hold of it.
An understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) and modern management strategies have only developed within the past few decades.
Current understanding of tethered cord syndrome first began with the understanding and management of spina bifida; this later led to the gradual recognition of spina bifida occulta and the symptoms associated with tethering of the filum terminale.
Usually children will complain of pain, if they are old enough or may show some signs of discomfort. As things progress they fail to gain or lose function of the legs, bowel or bladder. Luckily most of the conditions are picked up early due to unusual signs in the middle of their lower backs. These include fatty masses, areas of increased pigmentation, dimples or large collections of hair. When noticed these skin signs should prompt an investigation which usually includes an MRI scan. During infancy an ultrasound may be adequate to identify one of these conditions. Not to confuse things, it should be understood that if there is a problem in one site of the spinal cord, then there may be other problems such as syrinxes. For this reason it is a good idea to image the entire spinal cord and potentially the brain prior to treatment
162 children who underwent surgical treatment for TCS in a 15-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Their demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical features were documented. They were divided into two groups as primary and secondary TCS, and the surgical technique for each group was demonstrated. Untethering the spinal cord and correction of the associated malformation were the standard surgical technique for each patient. The results of the treatment were summarized.
Among the 162 children, 101 (62.3 %) of them were female and 61 were male with a mean age of 62 months. Primary TCS was detected in 43 patients while secondary TCS was found in 119 (73.4 %) patients. Hypertrichosis was the most common physical finding while back pain was the common complaint. Spinal lipoma, split cord malformation, dermal sinus tract, and myelomeningocele were the associated malformations for secondary TCS.
Children should be individualized for the treatment of TCS. Each patient must be evaluated neurologically and radiologically for the accurate diagnosis. Surgical untethering is the safe and effective method of treatment for children with TCS 2).