User Tools

Site Tools


cortical_stimulation

Cortical stimulation

Direct electrical stimulation (DES) at 60 Hz is used to perform real-time functional mapping of the brain, and guide tumor resection during awake neurosurgery. Nonetheless, the electrophysiological effects of DES remain largely unknown, both locally and remotely. In this study, we lowered the DES frequency to 1 – 10 Hz and we used a differential recording mode of electro-corticographic (ECoG) signals to improve the focality with a simple algorithm to remove the artefacts due to the response of the acquisition chain. Doing so, we were able to observe different components in the evoked potentials triggered by simulating the cortex or the subcortical white matter pathways near the recording electrodes and by stimulating the cortex remotely from the recording site. More particularly, P0 and N1 components were repeatedly observed on raw ECoG signals without the need to average the data. This new methodology is important to probe the electrophysiological states and the connectivity of the brain in vivo and in real-time, namely to perform electrophysiological brain mapping on human patients operated in the neurosurgical room and to better understand the electrophysiological spreading of DES 1).

Indications

Cortical stimulation indications.

Limitations

DES, however, also has a limitation: its specificity is suboptimal. Indeed, DES may lead to interpretations that a structure is crucial because of the induction of a transient functional response when stimulated, whereas (1) this effect is caused by the backward spreading of the electro-stimulation along the network to an essential area and/or (2) the stimulated region can be functionally compensated owing to long-term brain plasticity mechanisms.

Direct Electrical stimulation is still the gold standard for brain mapping, its combination with new methods such as perioperative neurofunctional imaging and biomathematical modeling is now mandatory, in order to clearly differentiate those networks that are actually indispensable to function from those that can be compensated 2).

see Intraoperative stimulation mapping

Case series

Twenty-one pediatric patients with epilepsy or temporal lobe pathology underwent ECS mapping using visual (n = 21) and auditory (n = 14) tasks. Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether the frequency of errors in the stimulated trials was greater than the patient's baseline error rate for each tested modality and subregion.

While the medial superior temporal gyrus was a common language site for both visual and auditory language (43.8% and 46.2% of patients, respectively), other subregions showed significant differences between modalities, and there was significant variability between patients. Visual language was more likely to be located in the anterior temporal lobe than was auditory language. The pediatric patients exhibited fewer parietal language sites and a larger range of sites overall than did adult patients in previously published studies.

There was no single area critical for language in more than 50% of patients tested in either modality for which more than 1 patient was tested (n > 1), affirming that language function is plastic in the setting of dominant-hemisphere pathology. The high rates of language function throughout the left frontal, temporal, and anterior parietal regions with few areas of overlap between modalities suggest that ECS mapping with both visual and auditory testing is necessary to obtain a comprehensive language map prior to epileptic focus or tumor resection 3).

2017

Electrocorticograph recordings were reviewed to determine incidence of ECS-induced ADs and seizures. Multivariable analyses for predictors of AD/seizure occurrence and their thresholds were performed. RESULTS: In 122 patients, the incidence of ADs and seizures was 77% (94/122) and 35% (43/122) respectively. Males (odds ratio [OR] 2.92, 95% CI 1.21-7.38, p=0.02) and MRI-negative patients (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.24-13.7, p=0.03) were found to have higher odds of ECS-induced ADs. A significant trend for decreasing AD thresholds with age was seen (regression co-efficient -0.151, 95% CI -0.267 to -0.035, p=0.011). ECS-induced seizures were more likely in patients with lateralized functional imaging (OR 6.62, 95% CI 1.36-55.56, p=0.036, for positron emission tomography) and presence of ADs (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.12-13.36, p=0.043).

ECS is associated with a high incidence of ADs and seizures. With age, current thresholds decrease and the probability for AD/seizure occurrence increases.

ADs and seizures during ECS brain mapping are potentially hazardous and affect its functional validity. Thus, safer method(s) for brain mapping with improved neurophysiologic validity are desirable 4).

2016

Corley et al, retrospectively analyzed data from 92 patients with medically intractable epilepsy who had extra-operative cortical electrical stimulation. Mapping records were evaluated and information gathered about demographic data, as well as the thresholds of stimulation for motor, sensory, speech, and other responses; typical seizure behavior; and the induction of afterdischarges.

Ninety-two patient cortical stimulation mapping reports were analyzed. The average of the minimum thresholds for motor response was 4.15mA±2.67. The average of the minimum thresholds for sensory response was 3.50mA±2.15. The average of the minimum thresholds for speech response was 4.48mA±2.42. The average of the minimum thresholds for afterdischarge was 4.33mA±2.37. Most striking were the degree of variability and wide range of thresholds seen between patients and within the different regions of the same patient 5).

1)
Vincent M, Bonnetblanc F, Mandonnet E, Boyer A, Duffau H, Guiraud D. Measuring the electrophysiological effects of direct electrical stimulation after awake brain surgery. J Neural Eng. 2019 Nov 28. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab5cdd. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31778987.
2)
Mandonnet E, Winkler PA, Duffau H. Direct electrical stimulation as an input gate into brain functional networks: principles, advantages and limitations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Feb;152(2):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0469-0. Epub 2009 Jul 29. Review. PubMed PMID: 19639247.
3)
Muh CR, Chou ND, Rahimpour S, Komisarow JM, Spears TG, Fuchs HE, Serafini S, Grant GA. Cortical stimulation mapping for localization of visual and auditory language in pediatric epilepsy patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Nov 8:1-10. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.PEDS1922. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31703207.
4)
Aungaroon G, Zea Vera A, Horn PS, Byars AW, Greiner HM, Tenney JR, Arthur TM, Crone NE, Holland KD, Mangano FT, Arya R. After-discharges and seizures during pediatric extra-operative electrical cortical stimulation functional brain mapping: Incidence, thresholds, and determinants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul 18. pii: S1388-2457(17)30493-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.259. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28778475.
5)
Corley JA, Nazari P, Rossi VJ, Kim NC, Fogg LF, Hoeppner TJ, Stoub TR, Byrne RW. Cortical stimulation parameters for functional mapping. Seizure. 2016 Nov 23;45:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.015. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 27914225.
cortical_stimulation.txt · Last modified: 2019/11/30 08:52 by administrador