Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— | hybrid_cerebrovascular_surgeon [2022/08/16 12:20] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Hybrid cerebrovascular surgeon ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Because the fields of [[microvascular]] and [[endovascular]] surgeries are both technically complex, there has been concern that [[hybrid]] [[cerebrovascular]] [[surgeon]]s cannot perform each technique with the skill necessary to achieve good outcomes. When compared to clipping and coiling reviews in the neurosurgical literature, we illustrate that one hybrid neurovascular surgeon is capable of attaining great facility in both techniques and that this type of physician will represent one practice model of cerebrovascular specialist in the future. This has potential implications for the training of hybrid cerebrovascular surgeons | ||
+ | ((Alexander BL, Riina HA. The combined approach to intracranial aneurysm treatment. Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec; | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | A [[study]] evaluated the outcomes of [[coiling]] versus [[clipping]] of unruptured [[anterior communicating artery aneurysm]]s (A-com) treated by a hybrid [[vascular neurosurgeon]] to suggest the best [[protocol]] of [[management]] for these conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | They [[retrospective]]ly [[review]]ed the [[record]]s of 70 [[patient]]s with an unruptured A-com aneurysm treated with coiling or clipping performed by a hybrid vascular neurosurgeon between March [[2012]] and December [[2019]]. The patients were dichotomized, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Of the 70 patients identified, 37 underwent coiling and 33 clipping. Procedure-related symptomatic complications occurred in 2 patients (5.4%) in the coil group and 3 patients (9.1%) in the clip group. Poor clinical outcome ([[modified Rankin Scale]] [mRS] of 3 to 6) at 6 months of follow-up was seen in only one patient (2.7%) for the coil group, and none for the clip group. The one poor outcome was the result of intra-procedural rupture during coiling. Follow-up conventional [[angiography]] data (mean duration, 15.0 months) revealed that the major [[recanalization]] rate is 5.6% for the coil group and 10.0% for the clip group. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Management of A-com aneurysms requires more collaboration between microsurgical clipping and endovascular therapy. Evaluation of patient and aneurysm characteristics by considering the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques could provide an optimal treatment modality. A hybrid vascular neurosurgeon is expected to be a proper solution for the management of these conditions | ||
+ | ((Moon JS, Choi CH, Lee TH, Ko JK. Result of coiling versus clipping of unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms treated by a hybrid vascular neurosurgeon. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2020 Oct 6. doi: 10.7461/ | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | Since June 2013 a hybrid operation theatre is used interdisciplinary in the department for surgery of Ulm University. In this operation theatre a floor-based flat panel c-arm, which is mounted on a robotic arm that can be controlled by the surgeon in a sterile environment, | ||
+ | ((Richter PH, Gebhard F. [The interdisciplinary hybrid operation theatre. Current experience and future]. Chirurg. 2013 Dec; | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||