Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as a result of a bump, blow or jolt to the head or a penetrating head injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain. This trauma can lead to temporary or permanent impairments of cognitive, physical and psychosocial functions, and an associated diminished or altered state of consciousness 1).
There is a 4–5% incidence of associated spine fractures with significant head injury (mostly C1 to C3).
The neuropathology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) from various causes in humans is not as yet fully understood.
Penetrating head injury and closed head injury (CHI) that are moderate to severe are more likely than mild TBI (mTBI) to cause gross disruption of the cerebral vasculature. Axonal injury is classically exhibited as diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in severe to moderate CHI. Diffuse axonal injury is also prevalent in penetrating head injury (PHI). It is less so in mTBI. There may be a unique pattern of periventricular axonal injury in explosive blast mTBI. Neuronal injury is more prevalent in PHI and moderate to severe CHI than mTBI. Astrocyte and microglial activation and proliferation are found in all forms of animal TBI models and in severe to moderate TBI in humans. Their activation in mTBI in the human brain has not yet been studied 3).
When a detailed history is unavailable, remember: the loss of consciousness may have preceded (and possibly have caused) the trauma. Therefore, maintain an index of suspicion for e.g. aneurysmal SAH, hypoglycemia, etc. in the differential diagnosis of the causes of trauma and associated coma.
≈ 15% of patients who do not initially exhibit signs of significant brain injury may deteriorate in a delayed fashion, sometimes referred to as patients who “talk and deteriorate” or when more lethal, patient who “talk and die”.
It is not possible to outline a physical exam that is universally applicable. Major trauma must be assessed rapidly, often under chaotic circumstances, and must be individualized based on patient’s medical stability, type of injury, degree of combativeness, use of pharmacologic paralytics, the needs of other caregivers attending to other organ injuries, the need to triage in the event of multiple patients requiring simultaneous attention…
The following describes some features that should be assessed under certain circumstances with the understanding that this must be individualized. This addresses only craniospinal injuries, and assumes that general systemic injuries (internal bleeding, myocardial and/or pulmonary
General physical condition (oriented towards neuro assessment)
1. visual inspection of cranium:
a) evidence of basal skull fracture:
● raccoon’s eyes: periorbital ecchymoses
● Battle’s sign: postauricular ecchymoses (around mastoid air sinuses)
● CSF rhinorrhea/otorrhea
● hemotympanum or laceration of external auditory canal
b) check for facial fractures
● LeFort fractures: palpate for instability of facial bones, including zygomatic arch
● orbital rim fracture: palpable step-o
c) periorbital edema, proptosis
2. cranio-cervical auscultation
a) auscultate over carotid arteries: bruit may be associated with indicate carotid dissection
b) auscultate over globe of eye: bruit may indicate traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (Carotid-cavernous fistula)
3. physical signs of trauma to spine: bruising, deformity
4. evidence of seizure: single, multiple, or continuing (status epilepticus)
Despite many (valid) criticisms, the initial post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score remains the most widely used and perhaps best replicated scale employed in for the assessment of head trauma. Problems with this type of scale is that it is an ordinal scale that is non parametric (i.e. does not represent precise measurements of discrete quantities), it is non-linear, and it is not an interval scale, so that for example, a decrease of 2 points in one parameter is not necessarily equal to a decrease in 2 points of another. Thus, performing mathematical manipulations (e.g. adding components, or calculating mean values), while often done, is not statistically sound.
Due to the marked heterogeneity of human traumatic brain injury (TBI), none of the available animal model can reproduce the entire spectrum of TBI, especially mild focal TBI.
A stereotaxic coupled weight drop device was designed. Principle arm of device carries up to 500g weights which their force was conveyed to animal skull through a thin nail like metal tip. To determine the optimal configuration of the device to induce mild TBI, six different trials were designed. The optimal configuration of the instrument was used for evaluation of behavioral, histopathological and molecular changes of mild TBI.
Neurologic and motor coordination deficits observed sharply within 24h post injury period. Histological studies revealed a remarkable increase in the number of dark neurons in trauma site. TBI increased the expression of apoptotic proteins, Bax, BCl2 and cleaved caspase-3 in the hippocampus.
This device is capable to produce variable severity of TBI from mild to severe. The main advantage of the new TBI model is induction of mild local unilateral brain injury instead of traumatization of the whole brain. This model does not require craniotomy for induction of brain injury.
This novel animal TBI model mimics human mild focal brain injury. This model is suitable for evaluation of pathophysiology as well as screening of new therapies for mild TBI 4).
Brain Injury Association of Tasmania http://www.biat.org.au
Brain Injury Network of South Australia http://www.binsa.org
Brain Injury Association of NSW http://www.biansw.org.au